Yes, we are doing that in bigger articles (and it's also a common knowledge for speakers of Ossetic, without any doubt). I'll try to copy the Russian Wikipedia formula (they have a footnote in every article on the topic) and propagate it on all the articles (probably calling a bot owner to do it). Amikeco (ныхас) 00:39, 12 декабры 2019 (UTC)[ответить]
Amikeco Indepedent South Ossetia is only your dream, it is not recognized by most counties of United Nations, it is historical Samachablo, part of Kartli, Vermont He said false, in every page about this territory, they only write South Ossetia, they don't write about this that this is separatists territory, which one is occupied by Russia and official it is part of Georgia--ჯეო (ныхас) 14:46, 17 январы 2020 (UTC)[ответить]
Yes, there is little international recognition, but that does not mean that there is no South Ossetia or a South Ossetian government claiming that territory. See, for example, en: Tskhinvali, which refers to it as a de facto independent state. There is no "official" meaning, though the articles should state that it is contested by Georgia, though is functionally independent of them. You are pushing a pro-Georgian and anti-Ossetian narrative, and that is not helpful in building a neutral encyclopedia. Vermont (ныхас) 14:56, 17 январы 2020 (UTC)[ответить]
Now we have the big footnote to describe the state of affairs (based on two templates — the one in ru.wiki about South Ossetia and another one that we had here in Ossetic for towns in Kosovo). It makes articles really weird (most part of the text being the redundant information about Georgian claims), also the template is slightly broken, let us hope somebody else will fix it one day. Amikeco (ныхас) 15:38, 17 январы 2020 (UTC)[ответить]
